Blank-uri de spin vs. blank-uri de cast

[ULK]

[kingofbeasts]

deci pana la urma tot ai deschis topic separat
se pare ca au mai purtat si altii discutia asta:
http://www.rodbuildingforum.com/index.p ... opic=14377

[kingofbeasts]

Typically, spinning rods are used for used for lighter line techniques and the baitcast blanks may have a little too much power for those type of techniques.

http://www.anglerworld.com/bassfish/bas ... e_id=49490

Generally I like casting rods for jigging bucktails and heavier lures from the boat and bottom fishing. They generally have more power per foot of rod and more "backbone"..big casting rods are great for heavy large chunks of meat into deep water and waiting for something big to swim by and eat it.

http://www.stripersonline.com/t/359094/ ... nning-rods

[kingofbeasts]

however an important point to note is that good BC blanks inherit a slightly stiffer lower section compared to a SP version.

http://www.fishingkaki.com/forum/viewto ... f5222ff040

[ULK]

Da, se pare ca la ei(adica unde baitcastingul nu este o noutate)..este acceptata ideea ca spin=light si cast=heavy...inteuesant ..

Alte perceptii oarecum, fata de Eastern Europe, unde nimeni nu se sfieste sa dea cu spin XXL dupa somn sa zicem...si nu plange ca nu are ranga de pana in 500g suficient backbone , nici macar cele pentru alte aplicatii mai light.

Se zice de talon, ca e mai puternic..dar prin prisma nalucii, pestelui abordat..nu zic despre fir si atingera sau nu a blankului.. A carui importanta incep sa o pun sub semnul intrebarii

De aici imi vine intrebarea...si rog daca cineva cine are asaceva, sa ne spuna...betele inliner(sau cum le zice corect)...inauntrul blankului au ceva ghidaj...sau pur si simplu in sarcina firul se freaca pe blank(binenteles ma refer inafara de inlet si varf)?

Ca daca nu au nimic, poate este absolut degeaba sa gasim un raspuns la intrebarea" Cat de important este ca firul sa atinga sau nu blankul la lansetele de BC?"