Test comparativ de lansete #5 in care sunt masurate si ca Swing Weight
http://www.yellowstoneangler.com/FlyRod ... orkBVK.asp
Orice lasneta se echilibreaza mai bine cu o anumita greutate(marime de mulineta ), un echilibru care face ca varful sa fie resimit ca greu duce al eforturi suplimentare, lipsa de precizie.
O greutate in plus fata de cea necesara echilibrului nu este necesara.
In ultimul timp luat in calcul si 10-20m de fir scos care diminueaza greutatea mulinetei si schimba echilibrul echipamentului.
Unele lansete sunt mai echilibrate decat alteel ,conteza distrubutia de greutete pe lungimea blankului ( blankurile conice si cu varf fin sunt mai echilibrate) si greutatea
Lucrurile sunt precise si aproape matamatice mici diferente sunt personale si unii pescari nu vor ca lasnetele sa fie perfect echilibrate dar foarte aproape. La spinning eu nu echilibrez lanseta exact de unde o tin, punctul de echilibrul este putin in fata.
O comparatie simpla este cu feedbackul directiei la masini, cele mai bune iti spun exact ce se intampla cu rotile si pentru a efectua viraje sau derapaje ai nevoie de un efort nici prea mare nici prea mic incat sa simti o directie prea grea sau prea usoara si inconsistenta.
Diferentele intre un Cooper S , BMW, VW sau Kia Getz, Dacia Logan sunt mari la cum simti controlul masinii.
Echilibrul lansetei este si el diamnic in functie de lungimea lanselui un Swing Weigh slab e si mai obositor cu cat distanta creste, in timp devine devastator pentru mana pescarului.
Lansete foarte buen sunt extrem de putine WT 7`6``ft. #3 e cea mai buna lanseta de pescuit pana la 10m .
Talonul IM6 a lui Tavi are varful ami greu si mai putenic decat #3 curat, rezulta ca nu se incarca cel mai placut la distante mici, e o lanseta buna face treba dar resimiti efortul de lansare si precizia sufera.
Cu WT eforul este ZERO placerea de a pescui maxima din pacate costa dar merita.
Am mai pescuit cu un St.Croix 7`6``ft. #4 real de putere #3 pe varf care desi bine echilibrat nu are suficienta precizie din cauza unui varf prea fin , si cu putere prea mica.
La distante mici pana intre 4 si 8m efortul de lansare este insesizabil daca lanseta este foarte buna.
Swing Weight – our new calculations
We intend this term to mean the weight you feel when you flex the rod in your hand, with the rod held in a horizontal position. (without the reel attached to the rod). In the past we figured out a good way to measure this on a postage scale, by placing the rod on a fulcrum that was positioned about 1 ½ inches back from the top of the grip with the rod in a horizontal position. Then we simply placed enough weight on the very back end of the reel seat to keep the rod horizontal and read the weight on the scale.
This year Justin was examining a formula for the Moment of Inertia and found that these calculations very closely matched what I was coming up with by positioning the rod on the scale. With the new method we weighed each section of each rod and then applied the formula. This formula puts more importance in the weight of the 2nd half of the rod (the tip). Some of the manufacturers are designing very light rods in overall weight, and promoting them as the lightest, but they are heavier in the tip and heavier in swing weight than several of the other rods. A rod with a little extra weight in the butt can still have a low swing weight, while a rod with a heavy 2nd half and a light butt will have a heavy swing weight.
By waggling the rods in our hand it was apparent that the new calculations were confirming what we were feeling. You could really tell a big difference from the lightest swing weight (Hardy Zenith) to the heaviest swing weight (Thomas & Thomas).